Friday, 13 June 2014

Embedding the minimum core - Effectiveness?


“These skills are important for achievement in the FE sector as well as in employment. Many learners with literacy, language, numeracy and ICT skills gaps, however, may not be attracted to discrete English, Mathematics and ICT provision. They may want to work towards a different qualification, for example, in a college or a more informal context, and feel that developing literacy, language, numeracy and ICT skills is not relevant, or that they left all that behind them at school” (LLUK, 2007, p. 4)

This is especially apparent within my own teaching practice experience. Many learners studying vocational courses are reluctant to re-establish an educational connection to the minimum core. There is a presumption that once you have left school you will not be forced to continue studying subjects that you have not chosen. A way to combat this perception with learners is to start to initiate situations where they use the skills, mathematics for instance, and design sessions which promote the use, identification and acknowledgement of the practical applications of their skills. Casey and Cara et al (2006) further that it is essential to create and implement ‘meaningful’ lessons. By incorporating their main learning aim it not only makes the learners more enthusiastic about literacy, language, numeracy, and ICT but develops their skills in a useful and relevant manner.

Casey and Cara et al (2006) in their report “you wouldn’t expect a maths teacher to teach plastering...” they identify the significance of providing opportunities to develop minimum core skills within their main course and further discuss the impact this has on learner achievement. The key suggestions from this report is how the minimum core is embedded within the main learning programme rather than being taught as a separate subject, evidencing strong relationships between achievement and embedded courses. Casey and Cara et al (2006) state from their findings learners studying on an embedded course had 42% higher achievement of literacy compared to learners on a non-embedded course. Additionally, for embedded courses numeracy achievement resulted in 20% higher achievement compared to a non-embedded course. This statistics provide evidence of a) the need for skill development of minimum core subjects and skills and b) the positive effect on learner achievement possible if this was to be implemented across FE college programmes then it could have a very positive impact on achievement and development of minimum core skills.